High Speed Rail

TRANSDEF has long been a supporter of High Speed Rail over the Altamont Pass into the San Francisco Bay Area. See: California High Speed Rail Authority. This route makes tremendous sense from the standpoint of cost-effective regional transportation planning. The two interregional connections most in need of additional transit capacity are the Bay Area-to-Central Valley and the Bay Area-to-Sacramento routes. The Altamont alignment (orange on the map below) would provide the infrastructure for both of these key connections, essentially for free.

The Pacheco alignment (blue on the map below) would provide no additional public benefits for our region, doing nothing for congested corridors. In controversial (and we suspect corrupt) actions, the Pacheco alignment has nonetheless been recommended by both
MTC and the High Speed Rail Authority staff. The only substantial beneficiaries of Pacheco we can see are speculators, who would open up vast areas of undisturbed wetlands habitat for sprawl development (the dark areas in the map below). For these people, public investment in High Speed Rail in the Pacheco Corridor would shower windfall profits on their holdings.

Nighttime Satellite Image of Bay Area
We have been actively involved in commenting on the proposed High Speed Rail Alignment to the Bay Area, studied in the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Impact Statement that was published in the Summer of 2007.





Lawsuit Against the California High-Speed Rail Authority

We are part of a coalition of environmental groups and transit advocacy organizations that together submitted extensive
comments on the DPEIR/S. Our coalition also furnished a very large appendix, bringing our comment package to a total of 250 pages. A smaller coalition furnished comments on the FPEIR/S.

In addition to contributing to the joint comments, TRANSDEF submitted its own
comments on the DEIR/S.

On August 8, 2008, a coalition of environmental and transit advocacy groups, along with the Town of Atherton and the City of Menlo Park, filed suit to challenge the Final EIR. See the
Press Release and the Lawsuit.


TRANSDEF Opposes Proposition 1A, the California High-Speed Rail Bond Measure

The TRANSDEF Board adopted a position of opposition to the Proposition: TRANSDEF strongly supports High-Speed Rail, but feels the current California High-Speed Rail Authority Board and its staff cannot be trusted. Therefore, TRANSDEF opposes Proposition 1A.

The President of TRANSDEF, David Schonbrunn, debated Quentin Kopp, the Chairman of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, on October 22, 2008 on KALW-FM. A
podcast is available here. (A broadband connection is needed to download this 27 Mb mp3 file.)

High-Speed Rail expert Joseph Vranich
testified before the California Senate Transportation and Housing Committee on the flaws of the High-Speed Rail Authority's proposal, and concluded "It's time to dissolve the California High-Speed Rail Authority."

Here's a
podcast of a KGO-AM show about Prop. 1A. David Schonbrunn appears about 15 minutes in.